Yes, you're right. At the time of writing, my original article is now 10 months old. And that was based on findings over the previous 2-3 months. I'd have expected the world to have moved on by now, but the change of pace seems slow.
Thanks for the tip about RawTherapee. I've just had a quick look at the site. Runs on Windows and Linux. I don't use Windows anymore, apart from consultancy projects and the odd time when a gadget requires syncing via windows. So that rules the windows version out. However, I'll give the Linux version a try.
Also, thanks for the heads-up about how Lightzone stores settings. It's becoming an important point nowadays. How does a photographer store the original image, non-destructive changes, destructive changes and several exported versions which depending on the destination format? I ended up choosing Adobe Lightroom and I'm still happy with it. I'm still keeping an eye out for other tools, so RawTherapee definitely looks interesting there.
thanks for the pointer to RawTherapee
Yes, you're right. At the time of writing, my original article is now 10 months old. And that was based on findings over the previous 2-3 months. I'd have expected the world to have moved on by now, but the change of pace seems slow.
Thanks for the tip about RawTherapee. I've just had a quick look at the site. Runs on Windows and Linux. I don't use Windows anymore, apart from consultancy projects and the odd time when a gadget requires syncing via windows. So that rules the windows version out. However, I'll give the Linux version a try.
Also, thanks for the heads-up about how Lightzone stores settings. It's becoming an important point nowadays. How does a photographer store the original image, non-destructive changes, destructive changes and several exported versions which depending on the destination format? I ended up choosing Adobe Lightroom and I'm still happy with it. I'm still keeping an eye out for other tools, so RawTherapee definitely looks interesting there.
cheers
Alan